FatherMicah's Comments
Darkmoon Races Mini-Set Early Meta Decks - Hearthstone Pro & Streamer Legend Deck Lists, Deck Ideas, Decks for All Classes!
Has anyone else gotten their bank charged even after using gold to pay for the mini set? So now I’m out 15$ and 2000 gold. Where blizzard support doesn’t offer any help other than dispute the charge with your bank?
Patch 19.2 Constructed Balance Update - Nerfs to Blade Dance, Shardshatter Mystic, Dreadlord's Bite, Dinotamer Brann, Voracious Reader and Lorekeeper Polkelt
You’re all missing the point… seriously. And yeah any budget deck would lose to pally so….
Patch 19.2 Constructed Balance Update - Nerfs to Blade Dance, Shardshatter Mystic, Dreadlord's Bite, Dinotamer Brann, Voracious Reader and Lorekeeper Polkelt
Exactly they should have nerfed the early game cards not these. Never had an issue with Brann or Polkelt either. My main point is that whenever a deck is oppressive they nerf it. But throughout ALL of scholomance Libram had a significantly higher win percentage than the second top deck. But nothing was done. My other point is expansions are supposed to spice up the meta. Well that same deck had zero change and is still at the same win rate as the decks they just nerfed. At least aggro DH and highlander hunter had something new this meta.
Also I don’t understand what’s so oppressive about DH people need to learn how to play against aggro more… it’s not that hard.
Patch 19.2 Constructed Balance Update - Nerfs to Blade Dance, Shardshatter Mystic, Dreadlord's Bite, Dinotamer Brann, Voracious Reader and Lorekeeper Polkelt
Turn one attendant cements games
Patch 19.2 Constructed Balance Update - Nerfs to Blade Dance, Shardshatter Mystic, Dreadlord's Bite, Dinotamer Brann, Voracious Reader and Lorekeeper Polkelt
I have never complained publicly about this game. I even felt the battle pass was fair from day 1 (call me crazy). But they have seriously been complete crap with the balancing of paladin for YEARS. For two expansions now the same deck has been a problem in the meta. Introducing the new cards have created ZERO change in the deck. No ones even using Yrel?????? (At least I haven’t ever run into someone who played Yrel.) During scholomance on average Libram/pure pally stayed on average a whole 5% higher win rate than all the other decks. Sure now it’s not as oppressive but it’s still a pain to play against! It’s not fun and you have zero interaction with playing against it. Boom heals 8 health and an 8/8 with taunt AND divine shield for 5 mana??????? I remember wayyy back in the frozen throne days when Druid was oppressive and had the same win percent difference from the second highest top deck. They wasted NO time in nerfing Druid but have continually neglected the paladin issue.
Not a single one of these cards needed a nerf!
Suggestions
Aldor Attendant- 2 cost instead of 1 they nerfed mana wyrm because it’s stats were too much why are they keeping this card the way it is???? Especially because it gives a ton of value for mid- late game!
Libram of hope- summons a 6/6 or lose the divine shield part of the card
Quest Resurrect Priest - Saviors of Uldum - Zetalot
https://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/decks/moon-cult-priest/
Pretty hyped on this one I posted a pretty much identical deck July 30th 🙂
Hungrylock
Darkness was for fun against miracle rogue I’m switching that out. The deck doesn’t really aim to focus on Azari but rather gain the advantage with medivh with the seals
Guess they’re no longer secrets at that point lol.