Thijs’ Aggro Pirate Warrior – Mean Streets of Gadgetzan

Class: Warrior - Format: kraken - Type: aggro - Season: season-33 - Style: ladder - Meta Deck: Aggro Pirate Warrior

Rate this Deck

Like or Dislike? Take a second to tell us how you feel!

+27

Deck Import

Use the checkboxes to compare up to eight decks!

Leave a Reply

14 Comments

Discuss This Deck
  1. smashthegame
    December 9, 2016 at 11:22 PM

    I use a similar deck that I grabbed off one of your competitor’s sites, except it runs Leeroy for extra finishing power. http://i.imgur.com/2R2ovSo.png

  2. Frenno
    December 2, 2016 at 6:43 PM

    How do we have to use patches with this deck?

  3. Nohadon
    December 2, 2016 at 2:35 PM

    Is Patches or Hobart better? I only have the dust for one. Also what would be the replacement for what I don’t make?

    • Evident - Author
      December 2, 2016 at 2:36 PM

      I am pretty sure Patches is better, but maybe other people have an opinion on it.

    • Brasky
      December 2, 2016 at 8:08 PM

      Hobart is better IMO. Patches is just early pressure but doesn’t necessarily win games

      • Tenby
        December 3, 2016 at 3:49 AM

        Seems like you don’t understand the real purpose of Patches. It’s not the 1 damage, not the charge effect, not the fact, that it’s played for free. It’s the effect of playing potentially with 29 cards instead of 30. That also means a more consistent chance of drawing good cards.

        Actually, Hobart is way too slow. Pirate Warrior is not minion based. We aren’t Face Hunters. If some want a more minion based approach, search for Pirate Dragon lists

    • Ouncelot
      December 2, 2016 at 11:34 PM

      Patches is better. The big thing he does is help ensure you have a pirate the turn after, letting your deck ramp off pirate effects. People are burning huge spells to kill off early pirates and prevent ramping.

    • Anonymous
      December 3, 2016 at 1:49 AM

      Patches is way better. I (along with many others) don’t even run Hobart, he’s too slow imo

  4. Erodhar
    December 2, 2016 at 9:07 AM

    Substitute for greenskin?

    • Darkness795
      December 2, 2016 at 10:12 AM

      Second upgrade possibly? i havent play tested this so i dont know if that would work

    • Nyjene
      December 2, 2016 at 5:13 PM

      Second upgrade! work well

    • gingysnap
      December 3, 2016 at 9:37 AM

      I’m not certain if this is better than the other responses, but I subbed in Leeroy because I am also missing Greenskin. Just a fun card to play, has ended the game a few times.

    • Dreganius
      December 6, 2016 at 12:14 AM

      Grimestreet Pawnbroker maybe?

    • bdizzle45
      December 6, 2016 at 7:32 AM

      I used Skycap’n Kragg. Even if he’s in my opening hand, I usually have a good enough board to get him on turn 4. He’s even better when he gets buffed by Grimy Gadgeteer.