Hearthstone
Top Decks

SilverName’s Control Warrior (January 2017, Season 34)

Player: SilverName - Published: - Updated: - Dust Cost: 10,260
Class: Warrior - Format: kraken - Type: control - Season: season-34 - Style: ladder - Meta Deck: Control Warrior
Edit in Deck Builder
Video

Rate this Deck

Like or Dislike? Take a second to tell us how you feel!

+13

Deck Import

https://twitter.com/SilverNameHS/status/821417756801241088

Compare Control Warrior Variants

Use the checkboxes to compare up to eight decks!

Pro Warrior Decks

Leave a Reply

8 Comments

Discuss This Deck
  1. Jace Beleren
    January 28, 2017 at 1:18 PM

    Good deck but can’t beat Jade Druid.

    • yak
      February 3, 2017 at 8:26 AM

      you cant beat everything, but you can beat shamans with this

  2. Miguel
    January 25, 2017 at 4:17 PM

    How is better replacement for elise, ragnaros, ysera, or alextrasa ?

  3. DropTheGame
    January 18, 2017 at 4:36 AM

    The original idea of teching second gorehowl belongs to NaviOOT, as the whole deck itself, which was originally presented in the weekend/beginning of the week, so i suppose it would be pretty fair to change the title ๐Ÿ™‚

    Here’s the source deck posted in VS meta report Jan. 12th http://www.vicioussyndicate.com/deck-library/warrior-decks/control-warrior/

  4. MAURO S MARTINS
    January 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM

    Because the first will be Oozed against Reno decks.

  5. AdamThyme
    January 17, 2017 at 12:58 PM

    Why he is playing two Gorehowls?

  6. DeepBlue
    January 17, 2017 at 12:54 PM

    Why two gorehowls in this meta?

    • Koth
      January 17, 2017 at 5:05 PM

      Because all the reno decks are running 1 acidic swamp ooze. The ooze the first, you have a backup.