Loogiiqq’s Top 100 Legend Spiteful Warlock (May 2018) Posted By: Stonekeep - Published: May 15, 2018 - Updated: 7 years ago - Dust Cost: 10,080 Tweet Class: Warlock - Format: raven - Type: midrange - Season: season-50 - Style: ladder - Meta Deck: Spiteful Warlock - Link: Source Edit in Deck Builder WARLOCK (14) 1Flame Imp2 1Kobold Librarian2 5Despicable Dreadlord2 5Doomguard2 5Skull of the Man’ari1 8Twisting Nether2 9Voidlord2 10Bloodreaver Gul’dan1 Neutral (16) 1Dire Mole2 1Fire Fly1 2Prince Keleseth1 3Tar Creeper2 3Vicious Fledgling2 4Saronite Chain Gang2 4Spellbreaker2 5Fungalmancer1 6Spiteful Summoner2 8The Lich King1 Rate this Deck Like or Dislike? Take a second to tell us how you feel! +9 Deck Import Copy Deck Code Pro Warlock Decks Even Warlock – #220 Legend (SENA) – Wild S129 mlYanming’s Armor Warlock – Hearthstone World Champion 2024 Armor Wheel Warlock – #290 Legend (Clark) – The Great Dark Beyond Armor Wheel Warlock – #97 Legend (Onkrad) – The Great Dark Beyond Excavate Warlock – #450 Legend (Warshack) – The Great Dark Beyond Leave a Reply Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment. 4 Comments Discuss This Deck Mistark May 24, 2018 at 11:12 PM Have you possibly tested doom? It’s a nether for 10. It does have draw for each minion destroyed but maybe adding the 6 drop for seals to destroy the opponents deck to stay on top of burn might be an interesting approach? Log in to Reply yinduren May 25, 2018 at 4:50 AM Doom is in Wild now but would probably be a better inclusion if you were to do so Log in to Reply Charles May 17, 2018 at 2:19 PM Also, do you think Skull is necessary? Log in to Reply Charles May 17, 2018 at 2:19 PM You should trademark this deck as Frankenstein Warlock, or FrankenLock if I may. Log in to Reply
/rating_1_half.png)
/rating_2_off.png)
Have you possibly tested doom? It’s a nether for 10. It does have draw for each minion destroyed but maybe adding the 6 drop for seals to destroy the opponents deck to stay on top of burn might be an interesting approach?
Doom is in Wild now but would probably be a better inclusion if you were to do so
Also, do you think Skull is necessary?
You should trademark this deck as Frankenstein Warlock, or FrankenLock if I may.