Fibonacci’s N’Zoth Control Warrior (June 2017, Season 39)

Class: Warrior - Format: mammoth - Type: control - Season: season-39 - Style: ladder - Meta Deck: N'Zoth Warrior

Rate this Deck

Like or Dislike? Take a second to tell us how you feel!

+29

Deck Import

Use the checkboxes to compare up to eight decks!

Leave a Reply

25 Comments

Discuss This Deck
  1. shawn
    June 20, 2017 at 9:54 AM

    I beat him playing this deck this month with taunt warrior.

  2. iVOLK
    June 18, 2017 at 12:44 PM

    replacements for curator? its the only card missing .. should i play tauren the grimestreet informant or maybe a battle rage?
    any suggestions?

  3. Me
    June 13, 2017 at 8:18 PM

    I also don’t have twilight summoner. What about devilsaur egg?

    • Mclozo
      June 14, 2017 at 4:43 AM

      I would have to refer you to imnothammer’s comment below for a replacement. Devilsaur egg would be good with taunt affects (I.e. sunfury protector or defender of argus) or the buffs that paladin or druid offer but doesn’t work as well with warrior. Essentially you’d have to kill it yourself everyone cause your opponent won’t target it otherwise.

      I would suggest infested tauren since it fits the same 4 mana slot and provides more support in game than a 0/3 egg.

  4. Immolate
    June 12, 2017 at 3:30 PM

    Hey all,

    What is a good replacement for Cairne? I will eventually craft him, but are there any good replacements that I can use while I am waiting?

    Thanks!

  5. id
    June 12, 2017 at 7:15 AM

    Any replacement for twilight summoner?
    How about blood warriors

    • Imnothammer
      June 12, 2017 at 8:29 AM

      When evaluating a card’s replacement, you should first understand what that card’s purpose is in the deck.

      Twilight Summoner is in the deck to provide some insurance against board clears and to add value to N’Zoth. Blood Warriors doesn’t do either of those things.

      I would recommend either Infested Tauren or Harvest Golem. Obviously a downgrade but you still retain some of the aspects of what Twilight Summoner was intended to do.

      • id
        June 12, 2017 at 9:41 AM

        Wow i never think about that.
        Thank you for your advice. I will replace it to infested tauren

      • Squirrel
        June 13, 2017 at 9:22 AM

        CW does not care about the opponents board clears because it only plays 1-2 threats at a time. Twilight summoner is a nice set up for your own board clears though.

        Twilight summoner has been used in the past in similar decks. Previously it was a method of applying pressure to druids. I’m assuming that it is going to do the same thing to other slower decks now.

        I would tend to favor another midrange win condition that forces the opponent to comit resources to the board.

        I don’t believe infested Tauren is we’re you want to be. The stats are bad and it can largely be ignored. If it were me, I’d play a drake and Elsie.

        • Florix20
          June 22, 2017 at 6:41 PM

          No the summoner is for board clears- I used to play nzoth warrior a few months back and I was pretty good at it.
          The thing is that it doesn’t perform like traditional control warrior because nzoth is the win condition, therefore board clears actually are a problem as you aren’t playing big threat over big threat, rather you’re playing your threats all at once.
          Twilight summoners were essential because that’s like a free 10 damage still if they cleared your board, and usually that takes a full turn to do (deathwing, twisting nether, etc.)
          I won quite a few games just because I had stuff left over after a board clear due to twilight summoner.
          I guess you could replace it with Elise if you had to, because it’s a lot of value, but keep in mind nzoth warrior is more tempo and faster than regular CW, so I’d say just put in infested Tauren.
          In addition, if you did blood warriors correctly it actually might work (but still is a very bad replacement) as it would defend against board clears, t would contribute to nzoth (given you play your stuff before nzoth) and you have a lot of triggers to damage your own minions. However it’s still really bad so just go with Tauren 🙂

  6. alem
    June 12, 2017 at 5:29 AM

    A guide for this would be awesome

  7. Rasan
    June 12, 2017 at 12:19 AM

    I have king mosh and would like to try it out. Can I fit it in this deck with whirlwinds and what cards I could take away?

    • Imnothammer
      June 12, 2017 at 7:01 AM

      As you might suspect, King Mosh doesn’t quite fit into this deck. His job is already taken care of by combo’ing Sleep with the Fishes and Ravaging Ghoul/Primordial Drake.

      If you really want to try this out you have two options: (1) replace Ysera with Mosh or (2) replace the Ravaging Ghouls with Whirlwinds and the Sleep with the Fishes with Mosh

      Door number 2 is probably your best bet if you really want Mosh in this deck, but I think it is not an improvement.

      • Picklemonster
        June 12, 2017 at 9:41 AM

        Actually king mosh and whirlwinds are good and you should cut doomsayers they suck. Ravaging ghoul is a terrible idea to cut. I played a very similar list to legend already this season.

        • Adam
          June 13, 2017 at 8:04 PM

          Fibonacci only has like 26,000 wins with control warrior. He probably just didn’t know that doomsayers suck. Someone should really let him know about Picklemonster’s assessment. After all, Picklemonster did make it to legend.

    • It's A Secret
      June 12, 2017 at 9:19 AM

      If you really want to try out king mosh, try out this tempo warrior. Because King Mosh isn’t really the best control warrior card, it works really efficiently in this list.

      http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/845690-legend-tempo-warrior-s39

      • Rasan
        June 12, 2017 at 12:26 PM

        And yes I will try this one out soon I have dust to Hellscream. Malkorok I will replace with corehowl.

    • Rasan
      June 12, 2017 at 12:23 PM

      Acctually I did one more replacement. Took away one doomsayer (that I do have but think two is too much. One I kept because I have won some games against druid and shaman just with 2:nd turn doomsayer->concede) Also took away one brawl, one primordial drake and one shield slam, because I don’t have those. Put whirlwinds, king mosh and one battle rage and deck has worked well at rank 5 and 4. Haven’t yet played more than that. Thanks for advices 🙂

  8. ProFi
    June 11, 2017 at 10:04 PM

    how can i replace ysera and cairne?

    • LDES
      June 12, 2017 at 12:08 AM

      By playing another deck

    • Hello
      June 12, 2017 at 3:26 AM

      Cairne is reall important for this deck, replacing him really lowers the power level. Maybe a second summoner.
      Ysera shouldn’t be too important, just add another big threat like Alex or Grom. Or just add another slam, summoner, sleep with the fishes or harrison maybe. Second Rat might be okay, too. The problem is that you lose late game threats, even though N’Zoth might be enough on its own.

      • Lucky7
        June 12, 2017 at 2:57 PM

        I personally replaced Ysera by Elise and it works really well.

        • Hello
          June 13, 2017 at 12:30 AM

          Good idea! I play her in my Control Warrior, too. Strange that I hadn’t thought of her.

        • WhisESO
          June 13, 2017 at 3:18 AM

          Ysera is very good to return NZoth to your hand (If you can get dream from her)