This is a really bad deck. It has almost zero good matchups. It’s incredibly slow with no card draw and it can’t effecticely control the board. It shouldn’t be called a high legend deck.
I didn’t notice that, but still, winning 4 games in high Legend in a row means that the deck at least somewhat works and is not completely unplayable.
Sample sizes in high Legend are often pretty small. If someone plays 10 games and not 4 you could still say that he just got lucky. But that’s just part of HS.
I’d let it stay, because it’s still a fun deck. Let people decide for themselves if they want to play it (and I doubt that anyone will commit with serious crafting that early before rotation).
/rating_1_half.png)
/rating_2_off.png)
This is a really bad deck. It has almost zero good matchups. It’s incredibly slow with no card draw and it can’t effecticely control the board. It shouldn’t be called a high legend deck.
They did 4 games with it… Don’t feed the troll !
4-0 against midrange hunter :))
I didn’t notice that, but still, winning 4 games in high Legend in a row means that the deck at least somewhat works and is not completely unplayable.
Sample sizes in high Legend are often pretty small. If someone plays 10 games and not 4 you could still say that he just got lucky. But that’s just part of HS.
I’d let it stay, because it’s still a fun deck. Let people decide for themselves if they want to play it (and I doubt that anyone will commit with serious crafting that early before rotation).