Cantelope’s (Blastoise) Odd Taunt Druid (October 2018)

Class: Druid - Format: raven - Type: midrange - Season: season-55 - Style: ladder - Meta Deck: Taunt Druid - Link: Source

Rate this Deck

Like or Dislike? Take a second to tell us how you feel!

+23

Deck Import

Use the checkboxes to compare up to eight decks!

Leave a Reply

14 Comments

Discuss This Deck
  1. Creature52
    October 8, 2018 at 3:03 PM

    Wouldn’t greedy sprite be better than biology project? I feel like biology project would be too helpful for other druids and aggro decks.

    • Tyrano
      October 11, 2018 at 2:36 PM

      That’s actually a great idea. I thought perhaps the sprite would count as a beast and be triggered by witching hour but it’s not so I’d agree it’s a safer play.

      “You know what really grinds my gears … giving my opponent four free mana crystals …”.

    • DukeStarswisher
      October 12, 2018 at 6:24 AM

      greedy sprite being pulled by oakheart is pretty bad. That’s the only downside I know of.

  2. Albium
    October 7, 2018 at 4:50 PM

    Why not take out 1 claw and replace it with Death Knight?

    • Hexecute
      October 7, 2018 at 4:52 PM

      Because the spiders the death Knight summons are beasts, and mess with hadronox/witching hour 🙂

      • whalen
        October 7, 2018 at 6:38 PM

        Baku is also a beast

        • Grant
          October 7, 2018 at 9:35 PM

          But Baku is dead card you don’t play, still I would have dk as backup

    • glossar
      October 8, 2018 at 2:35 AM

      Death Knight ? or Lich King ?!

    • Creature52
      October 8, 2018 at 3:05 PM

      I don’t think the DK has a much better hero power than the Baku upgrade plus like what other ppl said, the spiders and scarabs are both beasts. I do agree that claw should be replaced by something else.

    • MonkBeast
      October 9, 2018 at 10:02 PM

      Because DK is Even LoL

      • Tyrano
        October 11, 2018 at 2:34 PM

        Malfurion the Pestilent is 7 mana. But still probably not a good include because you’re going to replace your hero power when you play it. Which isn’t bad (going from gain 2 armor and 2 attack to choose gain 3 armor or 3 attack isn’t a game breaker, but if you’re going to do that why go through all the work of making a deck of all odds)?

        • DukeStarswisher
          October 12, 2018 at 6:26 AM

          With that logic why would anyone run Dr. Boom in Odd warrior….

          • jhaze
            October 18, 2018 at 4:05 PM

            thats not comparable at all… going from +2 attack +2 armor to +3 attack OR +3 armor is way less appealing than +4 armor to Dr Boom’s upgraded hero power