Face Hunter – #6 Legend (Monsanto) – Descent of Dragons Player: Monsanto - Published: December 19, 2019 - Updated: 5 years ago - Dust Cost: 1,880 Tweet Class: Hunter - Format: dragon - Type: aggro - Season: season-69 - Style: ladder - Meta Deck: Face Hunter - Link: Source Edit in Deck Builder HUNTER (22) 1Arcane Shot2 1Timber Wolf2 1Toxic Reinforcements2 1Tracking2 2Explosive Trap2 2Phase Stalker2 2Rapid Fire2 3Animal Companion2 3Eaglehorn Bow2 3Kill Command2 3Unleash the Hounds2 Neutral (8) 1Blazing Battlemage2 1Leper Gnome2 2Kobold Sandtrooper2 4Lifedrinker2 Rate this Deck Like or Dislike? Take a second to tell us how you feel! +44 Deck Import Copy Deck Code Compare Face Hunter Variants Face Hunter – #6 Legend (Monsanto) – Descent of Dragons Face Discover Hunter – 6-2 (Sidisi) – Pre-Release Brawl Face Hunter – #373 Legend (Magellan) – Perils in Paradise Face Hunter – #10 Legend (Hypester) – Perils in Paradise Face Hunter – #110 Legend (Hypester) – Perils in Paradise Small Beast Hunter – #72 Legend (Uni) – Whizbang’s Workshop Beast Face Hunter – #39 Legend (wdd) – Twist S03 (Wonderful Un’Goro) Face Hunter – #56 Legend (CooK) – Twist S03 (Wonderful Un’Goro) Face Hunter – #373 Legend (ProfH) – Twist S01 (Wonders) Beast Face Hunter – #165 Legend (RishadanPort) – Twist S01 (Wonders) Face Hunter – #17 Legend (Corbett) – Twist S01 (Wonders) Face Hunter – Early #1 Legend (Mariana) – Twist S01 (Wonders) Secret Face Hunter – #63 Legend (RonMexico) – TITANS Secret Face Hunter – #39 Legend (StarfallMW) – TITANS Secret Face Hunter – #12 Legend (Gjrstad) – TITANS Secret Face Hunter – #30 Legend (Abstein) – TITANS Use the checkboxes to compare up to eight decks! Compare Decks Pro Hunter Decks Discover Hunter – #34 Legend (D0nkey) – The Great Dark Beyond Discover Hunter – #198 Legend (D0nkey) – The Great Dark Beyond Jormungar Hunter – #495 Legend (katakuchi) – The Great Dark Beyond Sandwich Hunter – #81 Legend (Soda) – The Great Dark Beyond Discover Egg Hunter – #49 Legend (Dane) – The Great Dark Beyond Leave a Reply Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment. One Comment Discuss This Deck Jakubvisek December 19, 2019 at 11:05 AM Why – 1 ? 🙂 isnT it good ? You think its not enough 2 explo. traps ? thx for opinion 🙂 Log in to Reply
/rating_1_half.png)
/rating_2_off.png)
Why – 1 ? 🙂 isnT it good ? You think its not enough 2 explo. traps ? thx for opinion 🙂